to FCC & HHS, 5 Oct 2026

This page is intended to provide information from Susan Clarke (while she is out of town and has no internet) on how to write Public Comments to the FCC and HHS on the topic of Human Exposure Guidelines for RF/MW Radiation that they are soliciting because EHT/CHD got a Writ of Mandamus for the FCC to reply to the Court remand of 2021. I will provide links to the Submittal Pages provided by CHD and EHD, at the end of the post.
NOTES FROM SUSAN
Updated 10/11/2026
Please tell the groups:
Right now we all need to focus on providing VIABLE, NOTICEABLE comments – meaning affidavits – to FCC and HHS. Likely A I will be combing through the thousands to find the most important ones.
Q. What makes your comment viable and likely to be noticed amongst the thousands of submitted comments?
A. Affidavit form and substantiation (evidence) in support of your facts!
So:
1) Entitle your comment “AFFIDAVIT”, put a jurat just below this title, and then cite numbered, factual points. Place your signature and the date at the bottom and scan. (For even more strength, you can notarize your signature.)
a) A jurat can be “I attest and affirm that the following statements are true, accurate, and within my personal knowledge.”
b) Your first statement can be something like, “I am an adult over 18 years of age.”
c) Your next statement can be in support of your credibility, such as your educational background and professional experience.
d) Facts that follow can be
- technical – as in the engineering aspects of RF/microwave radiation,
- experiential – for example, what happened to you medically from harmful RF/microwave radiation,
- scientific – like quoted conclusions of one or more scientific studies, or
- legal – like quoted laws, ideally with their citations.
You can ask others for guidance and substantiating evidence, if you wish.
Put your whole heart into it!
So,
2) What NOT to do?
a) Don’t use a wrong subject matter – this is essential! Instead,
Call the subject matter – the agent of Harm – by its correct and precise name:
RF/MW Radiation, not “fields” not “frequencies”, not “EMF”, not “nonionizing” or “nonthermal” – all of which are misleading, and over which the Agencies can claim they have no jurisdiction.
FCC specifically has jurisdiction over the highly xenobiotic modulated RF/MW Radiation used for wireless communications.
“Xenobiotic” is an accurate term meaning outside, beyond, or contrary to Earth’s natural, living system.
b) Don’t express mere concern, fear, worry, alarm, risk, doubt, or questions. These are considered subjective and nonsubstantive – and they can get your comment dismissed.
Rather state FACTS that you know and ideally that you can substantiate (prove) with attached documents.
c) Don’t guess or speculate, don’t cite “risks” when the scientific literature proves real HARM! Use the H words: hazard, harm, not mere “risk”.
d) Don’t have numbered points that are 3 or more lines long. Break them up into simple factual statements of what you know.
e) Don’t claim we need more studies!!! No, the scientific community has more than 20,000 studies! This is an ESTABLISHED science! We have all the studies needed to require much stronger regulation and bans!
f) Don’t show disrespect toward the Agencies that will receive your documents.
Just focus for now on submitting great affidavits with evidence !
Then we all have a better chance of winning!
Thank you!
End 10/11/2026 Update
Overall, the points were:
– Write an affidavit for each Agency, if possible – it will be more likely to get noticed & taken seriously.
– Be clear about the subject matter, naming the agent of harm accurately – “RF/microwave Radiation” – ideally at first with the descriptors “highly xenobiotic, pulse-modulated” – NOT “EMF” or “nonionizing radiation” or the “G”s.
– Use the H words – Hazard and Harm, not a mere “risk”.
– Note that power & power (flux) density are not the primary factors producing harm – rather, 1) modulation, 2) constant duration, 3) microwavelengths, and 4) multiple simultaneous signals are known to cause more adverse effects – and all these are the case with wireless telecom facilities.
– Refer to the authorities of the Agency (FCC or HHS), i.e., what they MUST (and must not) do.
– Provide SUBSTANCE – Facts & Laws (facts include your own experience).
– Above all, substantiate assertions with attached documents when possible.
– Distinguish between Infrastructural and Device radiation exposures – noting that infrastructural ones – always involuntary – may be more harmful than device exposures by their duration and simultaneous multiple interacting, heterodyning signals.
– Avoid disadvantageous terms and notions that get comments dismissed (subjectivity, i.e., concern, fear, worry, alarm, etc.), unknowns (risk, doubt, questions, “gaps” in the science), or mere “issue”, when this is in fact an urgent and dire problem.
– Don’t concede that “health” is preempted from the Telecom Act of 1996 – it doesn’t appear in the preemption.
– Don’t concede that the FCC updated its guideline in 1996 – the guideline has remained the same since 1965 – arguably since 1953. Throughout 2020-2021, the FCC was unable to provide any science or even reasoning in the D.C. Circuit Court for its guideline – it was merely a rubber-stamp in 1996.
– Give the Agencies ASKS – 1) remove unneeded wireless facilities and those that were permitted through fraud; 2) ban any further infrastructures, given the satellite & fiberoptic systems in place; 3) set a standard, at last; and more.
– Possibly point out that militaries use this radiation as a weapon.
End of Notes
Susan is on the road right now and I will be posting more information, particularly her slides, as I can get it from her.

I would like to apologize to those who could not get into the meeting on Monday. Next time I host I will send the link with my email if there are problems. Please leave questions in the comments below and Susan and I will try to get them answered. The comments are moderated you can leave contact information and give us notes on what you do not want published.
My website is not so up-to-date as I would like but there are some posts you may find of use, starting from the newest to the oldest. Check back with us if you like as I will be posting more information as I can get it from Susan.
Pointers from Luanne
>Smart meters are not smart.
SMART ELECTRICAL METERS – At the meeting there was interest expressed in information on smart meters. I opted out of my electrical smart meter in 2020. I was actually shocked at how my meter worked. It loaded my electrical system up with radio frequencies used for internal meter communications that could be wired. Then, every two minutes it gave off a high powered pulse to the base station. The signal is designed to travel 30 miles. At one foot from my V314 meter it blasted 282,000 micro-watts per meter squared. The radio frequencies on 60 Hz are considered high frequency transients, known as “dirty” electricity. The pulse to the base station sends dirty electricity all through the house. The internal radio communications seemed quite malicious to me.
SMART WATER METERS – Initially deployed as a conventional water meter with an electronic registry that connected by wire to a paired radio unit, a monthly ride-and-read did not seem like a lot of exposure. But water and electronics do not mix well and the utilities had to do a lot more meter replacements that they expected. Mechanical meter failures were blamed and they have come up with something else now. Yes. It is an electromagnetic meter that has no moving parts. I tell you, you cannot make these things up and these meters work by inducing current in the water to measure the flow. Yes. Many people are being electrocuted during their showers now, but it is just a little bit. Don’t even as about galvanic corrosion. FCC regulates these smart electromagnetic meters under Rule 15 and I had hard time getting them to look the multitude of abuses.
I put up some posts at a website I have for my community and I am fighting for a fee free opt-out program. Here is a link to the most recent post that links others back in time: https://thecrystalkey.info/2026/09/07/boynton-beach-water-metering/
How to Submit – Info from EHT/CHD
https://ehtrust.org/submit-comments-to-the-fcc-and-hhs-on-wireless-radiation
At this time it looks like the deadline for FCC Comments is 10/22/2026
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-requests-comment-rf-exposure-remand-0




















